{FAILED LOCK}
Really, the most irritating thing isn't his words. The opinions of others mean absolutely nothing; I'm certainly never lying when I say that. He'd like to think that he can get under my skin, and I'll admit that I've slipped up a couple of times in that regard- but that has been taken care of; it won't happen again. No, the most irritating thing is that he's right.
I doubt that it's fear. It would be characteristic of her, I suppose, to fear me- but for some reason, she doesn't. I also doubt that she's just "waiting to see me fall"- that could easily be done from the sidelines. It's that third theory of his that I've considered before (I hope he doesn't think for one moment that he planted the idea in my head; that I allowed him to create such an... insecurity). That she really, truly hasn't realized yet that I am a monster. At some level, I'm sure she does (why else would she have said...)- but once she starts listening to those other friends of hers; really listening to them...
Ty Lee has always been easily convinced of things.
I am a monster. I always have been. I've never denied it. But I don't know why the idea of her recognizing it and calling me out on it is so... tsk.
It's an inevitability. I shouldn't bother deluding myself into thinking otherwise.
...
That smug detective really does need to be taught a lesson.
I doubt that it's fear. It would be characteristic of her, I suppose, to fear me- but for some reason, she doesn't. I also doubt that she's just "waiting to see me fall"- that could easily be done from the sidelines. It's that third theory of his that I've considered before (I hope he doesn't think for one moment that he planted the idea in my head; that I allowed him to create such an... insecurity). That she really, truly hasn't realized yet that I am a monster. At some level, I'm sure she does (
Ty Lee has always been easily convinced of things.
I am a monster. I always have been. I've never denied it. But I don't know why the idea of her recognizing it and calling me out on it is so... tsk.
It's an inevitability. I shouldn't bother deluding myself into thinking otherwise.
...
That smug detective really does need to be taught a lesson.
no subject
no subject
This is getting ridiculous. I never had problems with locking things in the past.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
uber tight lock || i-if hakuba wants to hack, he can.
Re: uber tight lock || i-if hakuba wants to hack, he can.
Re: uber tight lock || i-if hakuba wants to hack, he can.
Re: uber tight lock || i-if hakuba wants to hack, he can.
Re: uber tight lock || i-if hakuba wants to hack, he can.
Re: uber tight lock || i-if hakuba wants to hack, he can.
Re: uber tight lock || i-if hakuba wants to hack, he can.
Re: uber tight lock || i-if hakuba wants to hack, he can.
Re: uber tight lock || i-if hakuba wants to hack, he can.
Re: uber tight lock || i-if hakuba wants to hack, he can.
Re: uber tight lock || i-if hakuba wants to hack, he can.
Re: uber tight lock || i-if hakuba wants to hack, he can.
Re: uber tight lock || i-if hakuba wants to hack, he can.
Re: uber tight lock || i-if hakuba wants to hack, he can.
Re: uber tight lock || i-if hakuba wants to hack, he can.
Re: uber tight lock || i-if hakuba wants to hack, he can.
Re: yeah, why not >:3
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
oops wrong icon XD
Re: oops wrong icon XD
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
Re: yeah, why not >:3
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
Re: yeah, why not >:3
[Locked]
Re: [Locked]
Re: [Locked]
Re: [Locked]
Re: [Locked]
Re: [Locked]
Re: [Locked]
Re: [Locked]
Re: [Locked]
Re: [Locked]
Re: [Locked]
no subject
I really love to be right, but I said that because you irritated me that time. I'm not taking it back though.
People can love monsters, you know. It all about accepting the person you really are, and see if she can accept it too. If Ty Lee can't love you by who you are, even if that you is not as acceptable as the others human behaviors, then it didn't worth your time.
You will be amazed about how many serial killers were married, and how many of them had married after their crimes, trials, and convictions. After learning everything else about them — reading and seeing what they did to their victims, and reading the accounts of those who survived — what probably surprised me most was that there apparently wasn’t anything these people could do that was bad enough for them to lose the right to marry.
I'm not smug, princess. I just know myself very well.
(OOC: wow he really strike that time, don't' he? O_o it wasn't even on purpose.)
no subject
... Also, I am hardly a serial killer.
I know myself very well, too. But you are smug.
OOC: Pfft, like she said, she's been wondering this sort of thing on her own for ages. :P
no subject
I didn't said that you were, I was giving you an example.You can think whatever you want about me, princess Azula.
no subject
I always do.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Strikes = potentially hackable for the lolz
bwaha
1/2
2/2
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
And I haven't just figured that out, either.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
What is it, Ty Lee?
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)