bentflame ([personal profile] bentflame) wrote2009-11-10 02:15 pm

{VIDEO POST}

[Have an Azula wearing red harem pants and a loose tunic-style shirt (this is video because she wants to show off her new clothes, OF COURSE), and looking to be in a better mood than she's been in recently (NO MORE WHINING, YAY)]

So as it turns out, I did go shopping last weekend. It wasn't as difficult as I had expected to find Earth-style clothes that I like, and I suppose--

[Suddenly Rachel starts making some cute happy gurgling noises offscreen; Azula gives the crib a quick, slightly irritated glance]

Hush.

As I was saying, I suppose it makes sense to wear Earth clothing during the times that I'm on Earth; I was getting quite sick of people asking me if I was dressed up for a play. And they never seemed to like the answers I ga--

[And she's cut off again, this time by herself, as she starts to sneeze six, seven, eight times in rapid succession]

... Ugh. That's disgusting.

[Winter colds are a bitch when your body's not used to the climate 8)]

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
In and of itself? No, it isn't. It's a means to an end.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
It's the most extreme form of foreign policy. You claiming it isn't is just you showing your own ignorance.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
Right, I'm the ignorant one.

Conquest is foreign policy. War is a means to achieve that.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 12:58 am (UTC)(link)
War is foreign policy, conquest or not.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 12:59 am (UTC)(link)
War is the act. Conquest is the idea. War is the carrying out of the policy of conquest.

Come back when you know what you're talking about, Kaito.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
You talk about them like they're mutually exclusive.

Why don't you come back when you know what you're talking about. Conquest can be achieved without war. Not usually and it's difficult, but war is foreign policy.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 01:14 am (UTC)(link)
No I don't.

I do know what I'm talking about, because I'm the one living it.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
Yes you do.

Obviously not, if you're not claiming that war in and of itself can be used as foreign policy.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 01:17 am (UTC)(link)
Do you even know what the term "mutually exclusive" means? Because that is certainly not what I was doing.

The idea behind the war, whatever it may be, is the policy. The war itself is an act of carrying out that policy. How do you not understand this?

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
War itself is the policy you use to carry out the ideals. You could use a different method, but you don't.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 01:21 am (UTC)(link)
Of course we could use a different method to carry out our policy of conquest, but we don't. This was the one that was chosen by my great-grandfather over one hundred years ago, and I'm not about to just halt it without good reason.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
Even though it's hurting others.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
It's not hurting as much as they think it is.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
I think they would know how much a war against them is hurting them.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 01:30 am (UTC)(link)
Of you're just blind.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
I've seen the effects the war has caused. Most of them aren't permanent.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
Death is permanent.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
There are casualties on our side, too.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 01:37 am (UTC)(link)
Then what's the point? Other than your pride.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
Conquest. Stop being dense.

You know, just to make things clear-- Fire Lord Sozin didn't wake up one day and say, "I think I'm going to start a war for the sake of my great-granddaughter's pride. She'll be born in about ninety years; I'm sure it won't be over by then."

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
Which is part of your pride.

Of course not. He decided to start a war based on his pride, which you inherited from him.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
He started a war based on improving the Fire Nation. It wasn't a selfish act, and it isn't one now.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
Improving the Fire Nation by hurting thousands of others. It was his pride in himself and his country that started the war.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
In his country, not in himself. You didn't even know him; what makes you think you know?

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 01:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 01:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 01:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 01:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 02:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 02:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 02:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 02:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 02:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 03:14 (UTC) - Expand