bentflame ([personal profile] bentflame) wrote2009-11-10 02:15 pm

{VIDEO POST}

[Have an Azula wearing red harem pants and a loose tunic-style shirt (this is video because she wants to show off her new clothes, OF COURSE), and looking to be in a better mood than she's been in recently (NO MORE WHINING, YAY)]

So as it turns out, I did go shopping last weekend. It wasn't as difficult as I had expected to find Earth-style clothes that I like, and I suppose--

[Suddenly Rachel starts making some cute happy gurgling noises offscreen; Azula gives the crib a quick, slightly irritated glance]

Hush.

As I was saying, I suppose it makes sense to wear Earth clothing during the times that I'm on Earth; I was getting quite sick of people asking me if I was dressed up for a play. And they never seemed to like the answers I ga--

[And she's cut off again, this time by herself, as she starts to sneeze six, seven, eight times in rapid succession]

... Ugh. That's disgusting.

[Winter colds are a bitch when your body's not used to the climate 8)]

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
I can't be biased about my own feelings.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
You can when you're in denial.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
Are you really implying that I don't have enough self-confidence, Kaito?

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
No. I'm just observing that you're in denial about a good amount of things.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
Thinking that I'm "in denial" about not being touchy about my ruling abilities indicates that you think I have low self-confidence.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
Or that you're touching about people talking about your ruling abilities because you hate critics.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
I hate critics who don't know what they're talking about.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
Who says I don't know what I'm talking about?

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
The only experience you have with me is over this community. You don't know about my laws, or my policies, or my beliefs. All you really know is that I'm fighting a war.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
You told me about the reasons you're fighting this war. That's enough.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 12:37 am (UTC)(link)
So you don't like one of my policies, and in your mind, that means I'm completely incompetent in every way?

You really know nothing about government or governing.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 12:42 am (UTC)(link)
War is the most extreme form of governing, Azu-baka.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 12:44 am (UTC)(link)
I don't use war to govern my people.

You're really just proving your ignorance here; you shouldn't say things when you clearly have no idea what you're talking about.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 12:44 am (UTC)(link)
You're using it to force your governing policies on people who aren't even from your country.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
And that means that you have a problem with how I apply my policies, not the policies themselves. For all you know, you'd be in complete agreement with the way I run things, but you just wouldn't like the idea of me trying to bring the other nations under that rule.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 12:51 am (UTC)(link)
Are you arguing that war isn't a policy?

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
In and of itself? No, it isn't. It's a means to an end.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 12:53 am (UTC)(link)
It's the most extreme form of foreign policy. You claiming it isn't is just you showing your own ignorance.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 12:55 am (UTC)(link)
Right, I'm the ignorant one.

Conquest is foreign policy. War is a means to achieve that.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 12:58 am (UTC)(link)
War is foreign policy, conquest or not.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 12:59 am (UTC)(link)
War is the act. Conquest is the idea. War is the carrying out of the policy of conquest.

Come back when you know what you're talking about, Kaito.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
You talk about them like they're mutually exclusive.

Why don't you come back when you know what you're talking about. Conquest can be achieved without war. Not usually and it's difficult, but war is foreign policy.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 01:14 am (UTC)(link)
No I don't.

I do know what I'm talking about, because I'm the one living it.

[personal profile] pandorabox 2009-11-11 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
Yes you do.

Obviously not, if you're not claiming that war in and of itself can be used as foreign policy.

[identity profile] peoplesprincess.livejournal.com 2009-11-11 01:17 am (UTC)(link)
Do you even know what the term "mutually exclusive" means? Because that is certainly not what I was doing.

The idea behind the war, whatever it may be, is the policy. The war itself is an act of carrying out that policy. How do you not understand this?

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 01:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 01:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 01:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 01:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 01:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 01:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 01:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 01:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 01:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 01:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 01:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 01:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 02:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 02:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 02:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 02:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 02:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] pandorabox - 2009-11-11 03:14 (UTC) - Expand